Are defamation laws keeping up with the evolution of the Internet? Judges weigh in—How to Legal
United States Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Thomas Clarence and Appeals Court Judge Laurence Silberman weigh in.
#SaveDemocracy | Use the good side of the Internet to combat the dark side
ghostwriter | occasional journo | pro se
freedom of speech, right, as stated in the 1st and 14th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, to express information, ideas, and opinions free of government restrictions based on content. A modern legal test of the legitimacy of proposed restrictions on freedom of speech was stated in the opinion by Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. in Schenk v. U.S. (1919): a restriction is legitimate only if the speech in question poses a “clear and present danger”—i.e., a risk or threat to safety or to other public interests that is serious and imminent. Many cases involving freedom of speech and of the press also have concerned defamation, obscenity, and prior restraint (see Pentagon Papers).
United States Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Thomas Clarence and Appeals Court Judge Laurence Silberman weigh in.
Will a Judge break his oath by citing defendant’s inapplicable case law as if applicable to thwart justice?
What’s How to Legal? The more you learn about the United States justice system the more you will
Threats to Federal Judges have increased 400% (2016-2021). Dark money, funny business & oath breaking, law breaking judges.