In the News
Hey everyone,
My defamation case, substantiated pleadings, and some evidence I filed in multiple courts has been cited in news stories about QAnon and U.S. elections.
Whaaat?!
I sued some Sandy Hook hoax, Pizzagate people, and Doe-Defendants for defamation (with related counts) before Pizzagate and QAnon were a thing.
If you read my court filings (which everyone can read) you would know that Wayne Willott, aka “W” the “Intelligence Insider,” aka “Juan O’Savin” was a likely Doe-Defendant in both my defamation cases. Well, he was, but according to 28 U.S. Code § 453 – Oaths of justices and judges, I was in court with oath-breaker judges. #CleanHands
59. The Plaintiff was mortified and stunned as Willott became an often daily presence on H&H Report, as “W,” their “Intelligence Insider,” and started citing scripture as a purported Christian watchman, for several reasons, including, but not limited to the fact that Willott’s full name was already public, and in other media venues, including The American Spectator as a “freelance researcher” in Arkansas during the Clinton era, who frequently appeared on his friend’s radio show, former President Ronald Reagan’s son, Michael Reagan’s show, and in the Post Herald.[7] The Post Herald story has since been scrubbed.
60. [Defendant] went on to make several outrageous and or false statements about Willott, with and without Willott appearing with him, on BTR’s H&H Report as “W,” the Intelligence Insider,” including, but not limited to that Willott was like or is the “real American James Bond,” is like his “brother,” a man of integrity ...
— My First Amended Complaint, p. 14-15 court doc, filed January 15, 2016.
This also includes Alex Jones who, at minimum, was a witness, and another likely Doe-Defendant in my case in the Western District of Pennsylvania.
Alex Jones jumped into my case in 2018 to raise money for one of my defendants to keep fighting me in court and for himself. He made similar false and defamatory statements about my case, as he went on to do in the Sandy Hook hoax case.
265. Prior to the 2016 Presidential Election, beginning in or around early 2016 until in or around the end of 2016, both dates being approximate and inclusive, Alex Jones’ (“Jones”) Infowars.com, in concert with [Defendant H], started claiming that Plaintiff’s Defendant [H] was a “former federal prosecutor,” in at minimum, written published form attached hereto as ...
— My Second Amended Complaint, p 76 of 141, filed October 1, 2018
My case falls into the #AlexJonesTexts 2019-2020 timeline.
Judicial misconduct affects everyone
You may review and confirm some of the oath-breaking, canon, and rule-breaking that occurred in my related defamation cases which could have and should have deterred the fake news, and defamation crisis.
Go to >> Judicial misconduct that enabled the spread of QAnon and domestic extremism (includes solutions)
Indeed, what happened on January 6, 2021, what many call an insurrection, was years in the making. Some of the reasons why it happened and how it could have been deterred, (i.e., if my cases were assigned to oath-follower judges) have been on my court dockets since the end of 2015.
■ December 16, 2015: See Southern District of New York’s District Court Judge Paul G Gardeph’s first order in my case. ■
■ September 30, 2019: See oath-breaker Judge Susan Paradise Baxter at the Western District of Pennsylvania, Erie Division, dismiss my Doe-Defendants before discovery and trash me, two years after my case was referred to her, in the fall of 2017, and she refused to rule on my First Amended Complaint twice. ■
Unethical, oath-breaker judges show you who they are
Judge Susan Paradise Baxter shows you who she is in many ways, including this time when she essentially blamed me for my case being four years old when my case was four years old because she would not rule or recuse twice as Magistrate Judge (aka the “procedural defect”), and then she still refused to rule again and faithfully apply the laws as District Court Judge.
Among her abusive oath, and ethics violations includes, but are not limited to repeatedly violating the Model Code of Judicial Conduct: Canon 2. Rule 2.7: Responsibility to Decide according to the American Bar Association.
Meanwhile, the Defendants and the likely doe-defendants in my case, including, but not limited to: Alex Jones, and Wayne Willott aka Juan OSavin of QAnon fame, kept doing what they were doing online reaching millions of people.
According to law enforcement that included fueling domestic extremism. See for e.g.: “FBI says “extremists” motivated by Pizzagate, QAnon are threats: For extremists, the Internet’s craziest conspiracies inspire deadly violence.”
When Plaintiff filed this Action on November 9, 2015, Counsel was not counsel for individuals disseminating Pizzagate (one who manufactured “evidence” again), (SAC § Exhibit 1-2, 31-34) and affected a Presidential Election, but now they are. Plaintiff blew the whistle.
Thereby, the importance of the issues at stake in this litigation are far greater than in other civil lawsuits which typically affect the parties’ private interests. Defendants, Does 1-20, and witnesses in this action, are also a part of the Russia probes and inquiries and lawsuits into the alternative media (for e.g. Sandy Hook families v, Alex Jones)...
— My Third Opposition to Defendants' Third Motion to Dismiss in Judge Susan Paradise Baxter and Magistrate Judge, The Honorable Richard A. Lanzillo's oath-breaker judge court, filed on December 31, 2018, p.35 of 37
It’s tragic.
How many more people have been harmed by fake news and defamation since I filed my defamation (and related counts) lawsuit and ended up in oath-breaker judge courts where obtaining due justice was not possible?
Due justice also would have included punitive damages which serves as a deterrent.
How many more people have since been imprisoned when they acted on fake news and defamation disseminated by individuals, and lawyers, including my defendants and likely doe-defendants?
How many?
In the News
“Wayne Willott’s influence is growing in QAnon world, but almost nothing has been reported about his background. Until now.” The Daily Beast, June 1, 2022.
Will Sommer, The Daily Beast
A coalition of ‘stop the steal’ Republicans aims to take control of US elections. QAnon is helping, Politifact, June 7, 2022.
Bill McCarty and Amy Sherman, Politifact
QAnon ‘bottom-dweller’ quickly amassing power in GOP primaries — and could control key elections in 2024, RawStory June 1, 2022.
Travis Gettys, The Raw Story
Shayan Sardarizadeh: Journalist reporting on disinformation, conspiracy theories, cults and extremism for @BBCMonitoring @BBCWorld
This is the most important yet under-reported QAnon-related story this year. A QAnon influencer is currently recruiting secretary of state candidates in swing states with the sole aim of controlling the electoral system in those states.https://t.co/2J2VK5Hyst
— Shayan Sardarizadeh (@Shayan86) June 1, 2022
Updated: Alex Kaplan: Senior Researcher @mmfa, focusing on social media misinfo/disinfo & online extremism. Statements are [his], not employer’s.
What Savin was doing with this coalition could have potentially linked QAnon to a future constitutional crisis. But now nearly all of candidates in the coalition have been defeated.https://t.co/kIB6reypi4
— Alex Kaplan (@AlKapDC) November 12, 2022
Updated: Mike Rothschild: Wrote THE STORM IS UPON US about QAnon. Writing a book on Rothschild myths (I’m not related). Seen/heard on MSNBC, CNN, NYT, etc.
My biggest concern about 2022 was these candidates winning and putting themselves in the position to refuse to certify Democratic winners in future elections. We’ve dodged that bullet for the next two years.
— Mike Rothschild (@rothschildmd) November 12, 2022
Indeed.
The legal profession is duty bound to self police
The good news is judges and lawyers are duty-bound to report judicial and attorney misconduct in ALL cases. And oath/rule-breaker rulings are being vacated to preserve the integrity of the United States justice system, so stay tuned.
Judicial misconduct hurts more people, including oath-following judges and lawyers who have to deal with the fallout. It undermines the integrity of the United States justice system.
In my case, it is also a public safety issue.
Just as the law lacks legitimacy unless those who make, enforce, and interpret it share a genuine commitment to treat it seriously, so too does an oath lack sanctity unless those who violate it are held to account.
Quinta Jurecic, Tyler McBrien, and Natalie K. Orpett of Lawfare. The Jan. 6th Committee on Why Oaths Matter, Lawfare, June 17, 2022.
Chief District Judge Mark R. Hornak, the judges, and Clerk of Court, Brandy S. Lonchena, at the Western District of Pennsylvania, and Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas need to self-police and hold their unethical, oath-breaker colleagues in the legal profession accountable before the fallout from their long-standing malicious misconduct and abuse against me harms even more people. This includes by vacating their oath-breaker judges’ rulings that thwarted due justice and failed to deter domestic extremism. #CleanHands
89. Upon information and belief, Defendants’ false allegations represented as real “news” are destabilizing, sow discourse, and causes fear, distress and unjustified paranoia among Defendants trusting readers and listeners who may also be incited and induced into action.
---My Second Amended Complaint filed October 1, 2018, p. 24 of 141
Let’s all do what we can do to prevent another January 6th attack.
