There is no greater tyranny than that which is perpetrated under the shield of the law and in the name of justice. — Baron de Montesquieu
Welcome back to How to Legal, where you’ll learn how to use the good side of the Internet to combat the dark side in this online era of fake news and defamation.
In this installment we’ll learn, specifically:
- the definition of civil;
- about a free legal resource to help you translate legalese;
- how to find the rules of civil procedure;
- the different rules that make up the justice system;
- state versus federal; and
- why there is no justice in a court with an oath breaking judge.
Remember, don’t burn out when you How to Legal. There’s a lot of information in these next two installments. Pace yourself. You can always bookmark How to Legal, scroll down to what interests you, and come back later and learn more.
Thank you for being a part of the solution to the fake news crisis.
Okay, let’s do this.
Definition of civil
For simplicity’s sake, I’ll be focusing on the rules of civil procedures, but the rules governing criminal procedures may be similarly found online.
For starters, let’s separate civil law from criminal law. You can find the legal definitions at dictionary.law.com.
“Civil” according to dictionary.law.com is:
1) that part of the law that encompasses business, contracts, estates, domestic (family) relations, accidents, negligence and everything related to legal issues, statutes and lawsuits, that is not criminal law. In a few areas civil and criminal law may overlap or coincide. For example, a person may be liable under a civil lawsuit for negligently killing a pedestrian with his auto by running over the person and be charged with the crime of vehicular homicide due to his/her reckless driving. Assault may bring about arrest by the police under criminal law and a lawsuit by the party attacked under civil law. 2) referring to one’s basic rights guaranteed under the Constitution (and the interpretations and statutes intended to implement the enforcement of those rights) such as voting, equitable taxation, freedom of speech, press, religion and assembly. Generally these are referred to as “civil rights,” which have required constant diligence and struggle to ensure and expand, as in the Civil Rights movement between 1950 and 1980. Violation of one’s civil rights may be a crime under federal and/or state statutes. Civil rights include civil liberties. Civil liberties emphasize protection from infringement upon basic freedoms, while statutory rights are based on laws passed by Congress or state legislatures.dictionary.law.com
those statutes dealing with crimes against the public and members of the public, with penalties and all the procedures connected with charging, trying, sentencing and imprisoning defendants convicted of crimes.dictionary.law.com
A free legal resource to help you translate legalese
Sometimes we can be intimidated by words we don’t know and understand. Considering we did not go to law school why would we know legal jargon? We wouldn’t, but we can learn.
Dictionary.law.com is a helpful and reliable legal resource that anyone can use to learn about the justice system. You can also use it to translate “legalese” – legal speak. “Legalese” is “slang for the sometimes arcane, convoluted and specialized jargon of lawyers and legal scholars.”
Thanks to the good side of the Internet and reliable, open-source legal resources like dictionary.law.com, you can easily translate legalese.
The Rules of Civil Procedure
The Rules of Civil Procedure are the rules that apply to civil proceedings.
While the Rules of Civil Procedure and the Rules of Evidence are similar nationwide, there are nuances, (some differences), in every jurisdiction, including Federal Court versus State Court. Rules can also be amended. So check the dates to make sure you are reviewing the latest version.
To learn the differences between state and federal, the Virginia Wesleyan University provides an excellent breakdown to help you understand the differences. This breakdown is similar in other states, but there may be slight differences so make sure you are looking in the right place, at the right court, in the right state or district.
You can also find the rules at the court’s website
If there’s a specific case you want to learn more about; or you’re a pro se (self-represented) party; and/or you want to save on legal fees and do some heavy lifting yourself, court websites have a ton of information you can use.
You can also find the rules the parties must follow when they litigate in that court at that court’s website.
These rules include the local rules, the judge(s) personal rules (sometimes called practice guidelines or the like), self-represented/pro se rules, attorney rules, and various forms and boilerplates litigants need to use.
So hypothetically speaking, let’s say you had questions about a hyper-politicized case in Arizona (linked above), and you wanted to know more, you would go to that court’s website to find the rules for that court.
To demonstrate, below is a screenshot from the U.S. District Court, District of Arizona’s website. This is a Federal Court. The green arrows are mine. I added them for clarity so you won’t miss any rules. As you can see, a court’s website gives you a plethora of information to learn How to Legal.
State versus Federal Rules
So let’s break this down further. You can locate Arizona’s state court rules at Arizona’s state courts. This applies to other jurisdictions. To demonstrate:
The United States Court’s website is a one-stop website to find the links to all the U.S. District Courts (Federal) websites, including the appeals and bankruptcy courts.
The process of a civil lawsuit
To simplify the civil process for non-lawyers, Idaho’s legal aid created a PowerPoint guide that I think did a great job of breaking down the process of a civil lawsuit. This process is similar in other states and districts, but remember every state has its own rules, so there may be some slight differences. Just be sure you are looking at the location and at the court where the case is being heard.
Wow, yes. There are lots of rules in the justice system but don’t despair, get overwhelmed, or frustrated, because in the upcoming How to Legals I’ll show you, as a nonlawyer, a quicker way to familiarize yourself with the legal process.
On that note, this is a good place to take a music break. Stretch, move around, dance. Remember to pace yourself when you How to Legal. For me, my music pick is Alicia Keyes, “The Underdog.” What about for you? See Alicia Keyes’s official website.
Why are there so many rules in the justice system?
The Michigan Courts – One Court of Justice nicely sums up the reasons why the justice system has so many rules:
“The Michigan Rules of Court are the rules adopted by the Michigan Supreme Court to govern Michigan’s legal system and the judges, lawyers, and other professionals who are charged with preserving the integrity of that system. The purpose of the Court Rules is to establish uniform rules and procedures for all levels of Michigan’s court system. These regulations ensure that cases are resolved without undue delay and that those who appear in court receive due process and equal treatment under the law.”Michigan Courts-One Court of Justice
This summary would be similarly applicable in other states.
Okay, that was a lot of information to take in. You are doing great if you made it this far! Let’s wrap up this installment.
I hope this information and the legal resources you can use will help empower and liberate you. Now you know where to go to see what’s going on regarding the courts and the U.S. justice system.
The more you learn about the legal system, the more you will have an appreciation and respect for all the ethical officers of the court, who live by their oaths, stand firm against corruption, and hold their unethical colleagues accountable.
There is no justice with oath breaking, law breaking judges
Update: See: The Wall Street Journal’s, “131 Federal Judges Broke the Law by Hearing Cases Where They Had a Financial Interest,” and Reuter’s “Thousands of U.S. judges who broke laws or oaths remained on the bench.”
* James V. Grimaldi, Coulter Jones, and Joe Palazzolo of Wall Street Journal, and Reuter’s Michael Berens and John Shiffman broke the above stories.
See also: Coulter Jones, Joe Palazzolo and James V. Grimaldi, “Federal Judge Files Recusal Notices in 138 Cases After WSJ Queries Rodney Gilstrap initially argued he didn’t violate financial-conflicts law,” Wall Street Journal, Nov. 2, 2021.
You see? This is why the justice system has so many rules.
Signing off now with another music break. Get up and move around. Your back and neck will thank you.
This time, for me, it’s Kate Bush’s, “Running up that hill.” (Kate Bush’s official website).
None of the information on this website is legal advice. While I have litigated as a pro se plaintiff, I am not a lawyer. This information is for educational purposes and to serve as a public service to help combat fake news against ethical judges and innocent people.
If you need legal advice, please consult with a licensed professional in your area.
If you learned something and would like to show support you may send donations here. Thank you! If you are stressed out by fake news, real news, or for any reason, you might want to check out Stuff for Stress and some merch.
ARE YOU STUCK IN A MEDIA ECHO-CHAMBER, or know someone who is, and need help breaking free? Take The Break Free from Media Echo-Chambers 30-Day Challenge.
There are problems on both sides of the political aisle and real problems that need to be fixed. Acting on fake news just creates more problems that need to be fixed.
Lastly, if you see any typos or mistakes, kindly send me an email so I can fix them. Thanks.