Home » FOIAS, Media & Book News, U.S. News, World

Hillary breaks promise to grieving families during Benghazi hearings

28 January 2013 No Comment

The curtain “officially” fell last week on the September 11, 2012 Benghazi terrorist attack investigation with outgoing Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s duplicitous, yet revealing, in that bone-chilling kind of way, unsworn testimony. All the warnings detailed in Hillary’s Benghazi Cover-up, The Fix Is In series came to pass without challenge. The Benghazi hearings were a smoke and mirrors, false idol worshiping sham where the truth and justice became an additional casualty to the fallen Americans.

We still do not know what Ambassador Christopher Stevens was doing in Benghazi or what his meeting with Turkish Consul General Ali Sait Akin was about. We still do not know what time his body was recovered or how he died. We still do not know who issued the stand down orders declining to help Americans under attack. As predicted, Hillary hid behind the intellectually insulting Benghazi Accountability Review Board report (ARB), chaired by her friends Ambassador Thomas Pickering and Admiral Mike Mullen, that blamed Ambassador Christopher Stevens, didn’t bother to mention Turkish Consul General Ali Sait Akin, “The Innocence of Muslims” Youtube video, or the group that took credit for the attack Ansar al-Sharia which translates as “supporters of Islamic law.”

Hillary’s long practiced skill at making a mockery of the rule of law, as documented in The Whistleblower, has been perfected. If Washington continues to have its way, no one will be held accountable for the murder of Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods, Glen Doherty and the first U.S. Ambassador killed in-the-line-of-duty in over 30 years Christopher Stevens.

During Hillary’s Benghazi testimony she broke a promise to the grieving families of the fallen. Some might say she lied to them again. (The initial lie occurred when Hillary and others in the Obama administration blamed the attack on a Youtube video.) The mainstream press ignored it. Did you catch it?

While the press (CNN, WSJ, ABC) highlighted Hillary’s “fiery,” fist pounding tantrum, during an exchange with Senator Ron Johnson of (R-Wis.), they dropped the ball at the critical moment thus allowing the Obama-Clinton regime’s cruel injustice for the families of the fallen to stand unchallenged. Didn’t the Obama-Clinton regime promise to tell them all the truth about what happened to their loved ones in Benghazi?

Watch Hillary’s exchange with Senator Johnson of (R-Wis)

Here is a transcript:

HILLARY CLINTON: With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided they’d go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator.

Now honestly, I will do my best to answer your questions about this, but the fact is that people were trying in real time to get to the best information. The IC has a process I understand going with the other committees to explain how these talking points came out. But you know, to be clear it is from my perspective less important today looking backwards as to why these militants decided they did it than to find them and bring them to justice, and then maybe we’ll figure out what was going on the meantime.


Maybe Hillary won’t tell the families of the fallen the truth because the Obama-Clinton regime already knows what happened and they do not want Americans to know about the gun running operation they have been directing to overthrow President Bashar al-Assad in Syria—an operation that could trigger World War III. The stakes are urgent considering on Saturday, as quoted by the semiofficial Mehr news agency, an aide to Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said, “Syria plays a very key role in supporting or, God forbid, destabilizing the resistance front,” said Ali Akbar Velayati. “For this same reason, (an) attack on Syria is considered (an) attack on Iran and Iran’s allies.”

What difference does it make?

By not telling the families the truth about their loved ones in Benghazi, doesn’t that make Hillary a liar?

Sean Smith’s mother would like to know what happened to her beloved son. President Obama, Hillary, Vice President Joe Biden, U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice, outgoing Defense Secretary Leon Panetta all promised to tell her what really happened. They told her to trust them. “Don’t give me any baloney, this political stuff… just tell me the truth,” she said she had said to them as she recounted speaking with them during a CNN interview clearly grief-stricken. Sean Smith’s mother described crying on President Obama’s shoulder and even in her grief the administration told her “outright lies.”

What difference does it make?

It also makes a huge difference to Charles Woods, father of slain Navy SEALs Tyrone Woods.

Remember during an interview with Glenn Beck on TheBlazeTV, when he spoke about the day his son’s body was brought home from Libya, how Hillary, after apologizing for his loss, told him that the U.S. would “make sure that the person who made that film [the Youtube video] is arrested and prosecuted.”

“When she said that, I could tell that she was not telling me the truth,” Woods said while he wondered why the Obama-Clinton regime did “not do something to protect” his son and the others.

All we know now is that the person who was not responsible for the deaths in Benghazi, Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, the director of the amateur trailer of “Innocence of Muslims” Youtube video, has been arrested and put in jail. That’s one promise Hillary has kept.

What difference does it make?

Even Ambassador Christopher Stevens’ family does not know what happened that deadly night either. As Associated Press reported Ambassador Stevens’ stepfather said: “Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has reached out to his family to offer her sympathies about the deadly Sept. 11 raid on the consulate in Libya that killed his stepson, but offered them no privileged information about the adequacy of diplomatic security.”

What difference does it make? And who cares that the ‘consulate’ was really a CIA outpost.